Comments on: Flowreplay is dead http://synfin.net/sock_stream/news/flowreplay-is-dead Streaming Thoughts from Syn to Fin Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:11:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Synfinatic http://synfin.net/sock_stream/news/flowreplay-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-63983 Synfinatic Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:11:25 +0000 http://synfin.net/sock_stream/archives/157#comment-63983 Unfortunately, history has proven otherwise. A few people have offered to help with flowreplay and then disappeared before writing a single line of code. This seems typical in my experience for all the open source projects I've done. People get busy, find out it's actual work or find out they don't have the skillset to contribute. If someone wants write access to the svn tree where flowreplay exists, I'm more then happy to give it and they can prove me wrong. Unfortunately, history has proven otherwise. A few people have offered to help with flowreplay and then disappeared before writing a single line of code. This seems typical in my experience for all the open source projects I’ve done. People get busy, find out it’s actual work or find out they don’t have the skillset to contribute.

If someone wants write access to the svn tree where flowreplay exists, I’m more then happy to give it and they can prove me wrong.

]]> By: Ezra http://synfin.net/sock_stream/news/flowreplay-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-63778 Ezra Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:19:13 +0000 http://synfin.net/sock_stream/archives/157#comment-63778 people [would] have contributed there time people [would] have contributed there time

]]> By: Ezra http://synfin.net/sock_stream/news/flowreplay-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-63777 Ezra Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:18:27 +0000 http://synfin.net/sock_stream/archives/157#comment-63777 Too bad. It sounded like a really cool project and extremely useful. If you had built the basic infrastructure, I am sure people who have contributed there time to build protocol handlers for specific protocols. These plugins could have dealt with statefullness or security features of particular protocols. Too bad. It sounded like a really cool project and extremely useful. If you had built the basic infrastructure, I am sure people who have contributed there time to build protocol handlers for specific protocols. These plugins could have dealt with statefullness or security features of particular protocols.

]]>